Modular vs Non-Modular Solutions: How to transform recalibration into a competitive advantage

Now that we’ve established the fundamental difference between calibration and recalibration, let’s explore how the architecture of your sensor solution can make this recurring constraint either a logistical nightmare… or a competitive advantage.

Non-Modular Solutions: The spiral of hidden costs

The rigid integration trap

When the sensor is permanently integrated into the product (hardwired), each recalibration becomes a heavy operation that impacts the entire host product. The end user then faces two options, both problematic:

Option 1: Laboratory shipment

Shipping costs for the complete product
Custom recalibration adapted to the host product
Extended downtime: 3 weeks to 3 months
Total cost: Astronomical

Option 2: On-site service

High and recurring cost for each intervention
Complex logistical planning
Reduced but difficult-to-organize downtime
Total dependence on the integrator or its partners

Global impact of non-modular solutions

Downtime: 3 weeks to 3 months
Recalibration costs: Astronomical
Location flexibility: Very limited
Planning: Complex
Cost control: None

Modular Solutions: The revolution of simplicity

The modular principle

This is where modular design becomes a powerful strategic lever. A sensor solution designed to be easily removed and replaced reduces the recalibration effort to a simple targeted intervention, without disrupting the host product.

Immediate benefits

Less friction for the customer
Substantial savings for the integrator
Better user experience
Clear competitive differentiation

Not all modular solutions are equal

Standard modular solutions

Proprietary software under manufacturer control
Recalibration limited to certain laboratories only
Vendor lock-in: dependence on the manufacturer
Reduced flexibility, higher long-term costs

Impact:

Downtime: A few days
Costs: Moderate
Flexibility: Limited
Planning: Moderate
Cost control: Partial

Universal modular solutions

Let’s take the example of solutions like those from Dracal Technologies:

Standard USB connection: universal compatibility
Free and accessible software: no proprietary license
Recalibration possible at any accredited laboratory
Maximum flexibility and total cost control
Complete end-user autonomy

Impact:

Downtime: Minimal
Costs: Reduced
Flexibility: Maximum
Planning: Simple
Cost control: Total

Solution comparison table

Criterion	Non-Modular	Standard Modular	Universal Modular
Downtime	🔴 3 weeks to 3 months	🟡 A few days	🟢 Minimal
Recalibration costs	🔴 Astronomical	🟡 Moderate	🟢 Reduced
Location flexibility	🔴 Very limited	🟡 Limited	🟢 Maximum
Planning	🔴 Complex	🟡 Moderate	🟢 Simple
Cost control	🔴 None	🟡 Partial	🟢 Total
User autonomy	🔴 None	🟡 Partial	🟢 Complete

🔴 Critical/High • 🟡 Moderate/Acceptable • 🟢 Optimal/Low

Conclusion

Universal modular solutions transform a recurring constraint into a competitive advantage. They offer your customers the autonomy, flexibility, and cost control they seek, while reducing your technical support burden.

In our final article, we will synthesize these concepts to establish a sensor selection guide that secures your investment from the design phase.

Not sure if your project will benefit from Dracal’s solution?

"*" indicates required fields

Full name*

Company name*

Email*

Tell us about your project*

PRODUCTS YOU CAN TRUST

Approved by engineers, scientists and researchers around the world.

Thousands of companies trust our products worldwide: